Warning (2): unserialize() [function.unserialize]: Extra data starting at offset 1913 of 1927 bytes [CORE/cake/libs/cache/file.php, line 190]
Warning (2): unserialize() [function.unserialize]: Extra data starting at offset 906 of 1824 bytes [CORE/cake/libs/cache/file.php, line 190]
Warning (2): unserialize() [function.unserialize]: Extra data starting at offset 762 of 1536 bytes [CORE/cake/libs/cache/file.php, line 190]
Warning (2): unserialize() [function.unserialize]: Extra data starting at offset 950 of 1912 bytes [CORE/cake/libs/cache/file.php, line 190]
Warning (2): unserialize() [function.unserialize]: Extra data starting at offset 1192 of 2396 bytes [CORE/cake/libs/cache/file.php, line 190]
Warning (2): unserialize() [function.unserialize]: Extra data starting at offset 1951 of 3914 bytes [CORE/cake/libs/cache/file.php, line 190]
diaphanes

Nutzerkonto

Maria Muhle: From the Plebs to the Demos: Two Notions of Political Subjectification
From the Plebs to the Demos: Two Notions of Political Subjectification
(S. 25 – 41)
p€ 9,95

Maria Muhle

From the Plebs to the Demos: Two Notions of Political Subjectification

PDF, 17 Seiten, 0.0 MB

This essay reconsiders the tradition and departure of Rancière from Foucauldian discourse analysis, recapitulating the basic concepts of politics and police in the examination of the plebs and the demos as terms and concepts between these thinkers. To think the political as a politics of the supplement returned to the voidless police is to acknowledge the precondition for the latter’s rupture, and to render it distinguishable. Across that rupture, the demos is that which is at once the whole and its part, and the defining moment of those that lack a part in the whole. Its aesthetic involves a quasi-mimetic capacity, to which Foucault’s treatment of the plebs as an aspect of the infamous can be considered precursory. This leads to what is probably the central, certainly the most persistent question of thinking the political: How can resistance be thought within systems, if those systems double as the objects of resistance? As Foucault places the resistance of the plebs within the relations of power from which it emerges, the mimesis that familiarizes resistance at its most dangerous with the shape of the resisted comes into focus.

  • Politik
  • Kunst
  • Widerstand
  • Gegenwartskunst
  • Soziale Bewegungen
  • Aktivismus
  • Gemeinschaft

Meine Sprache
Deutsch

Aktuell ausgewählte Inhalte
Deutsch, Englisch, Französisch

Ändern

Maria Muhle

Maria Muhle ist Professorin für Philosophie | Ästhetische Theorie an der Akademie der Bildenden Künste München und Begründerin des August Verlags Berlin. Sie ist Mitglied der DFG-Forschergruppe »Medien und Mimesis«, P.I. am IDK Mimesis der LMU München und war im Frühjahr 2018 Fellow an der Kolleg-Forschergruppe BildEvidenz der FU Berlin. Ihre Forschungsschwerpunkte sind Politische Ästhetik, Medienphilosophie, Mimesis, Strategien des Reenactment und Biopolitik. Veröffentlichungen (u.a.): Black Box Leben (Hg. zus. m. Ch. Voss, 2017); »Mimesis und Aisthesis. Realismus und Geschichte bei Auerbach und Rancière«, in: Joseph Vogl, Veronika Thanner, Dorothea Walzer (Hg.), Die Wirklichkeit des Realismus (2018); »›Beweis zu nichts‹. Marcel Odenbachs Geschichtsbilder«, in: Marcel Odenbach. Beweis zu nichts, Kunsthalle Wien 2018 und »Praktiken des Inkarnierens. Nachstellen, Verkörpern, Einverleiben«, in: Zeitschrift für Medien- und Kulturforschung (2017).

Marietta Kesting (Hg.), Maria Muhle (Hg.), ...: Hybride Ökologien
b€ 30,00 p€ 30,00
Marietta Kesting (Hg.), Maria Muhle (Hg.), ...: Hybrid Ecologies
p€ 30,00 b€ 30,00
Weitere Texte von Maria Muhle bei DIAPHANES
Anneka Esch-van Kan (Hg.), Stephan Packard (Hg.), ...: Thinking – Resisting – Reading the Political
b€ 35,00 p€ 35,00

Anneka Esch-van Kan (Hg.), Stephan Packard (Hg.), Philipp Schulte (Hg.)

Thinking – Resisting – Reading the Political

Broschur, 332 Seiten

PDF, 332 Seiten, 0.0 MB

This volume contrasts a number of recently suggested concepts of the political – each of which connects to certain instances of art and literature in its discourse – with questions concerning the rigidity of those connections: How strongly do such claims to politics depend on their specific examples, what is the scope of their validity to understand art with regard to politics, and how can they help us grasp the political within other pieces of art? In each case, manners of thinking concepts of the political, the mutual resistance of such concepts and their academic treatment, and the turn towards specific readings informed by those concepts converge.

The essays collected in “Thinking Resistances. Current Perspectives on Politics, Community, and Art“ engage with political phenomena in their interrelations with arts as well as with recent theoretical and philosophical perspectives on the very meaning of politics, the political, and community.

With contributions by Armen Avanessian, Friedrich Balke, Judith Butler, Simon Critchley, Anneka Esch-van Kan, Josef Früchtl, Andreas Hetzel, Jon McKenzie, Dieter Mersch, Chantal Mouffe, Maria Muhle, Nikolaus Müller-Schöll, Stephan Packard, Wim Peeters, Jacques Rancière, Juliane Rebentisch, Gabriel Rockhill, Frank Ruda and Philipp Schulte.

Inhalt